The Lockbox is Empty

Today’s Bloomberg/WAPO article is kind of old news since Social Security went “cash negative” last year.  I guess the story is that everyone is still politely ignoring it.  That mythical social security lockbox was emptied long ago to “lend” money to the federal government.  Now the feds are supposed to start paying it back.  But even if (when!  when!) they do, there are certain numerical realities.  To wit: Social Security is a cash transfer program.  A working person pays in, a retiree takes out.  But with the aging of the baby boomers, there are now more people pulling from the system than paying into it.

Americans are living longer.  When Social Security was originally created in the 1930s, it was not designed as a retirement program.  Payouts began at 65 but the average life expectancy was 63.  Today, more and more people are living into their hundreds.  Last year at an insurance course I had to take (shudder) we were informed that actuaries were projecting today’s eight year olds would live into their 130’s.  It seems clear to me that the date when Social Security payouts begin needs to be moved back.    Imagine someone who goes to college, enters the workforce around 24, retires at 65 after a 41-year career, and then lives until 95.  That means that person will have been not working for more years than they worked.  Nice if you can afford it – not so great if it’s on the taxpayer’s dime.

That said, insurance companies have these things called annuities where you pay in regularly, and they give you a guaranteed payout for life or a certain number of years.  They’re able to do this because they invest the money and hedge their bets.  So it is possible to get a long retirement payout – just not the way Social Security is currently structured.  Of course, this would require some of that evil capitalism so privatizing Social Security at any level is probably a no go.  Unfortunately.


About Mystic Cowgirl

I worked overseas in the aid game for longer than I'd like to admit and learned several important things: 1) Third World countries aren't poor because America is rich. They're impoverished due to socialist governments that provide neither rule of law nor basic infrastructures; 2) These socialist governments redistribute wealth from taxpayers to the government workers. There's no benefit to the poor or downtrodden, and certainly not to the general welfare in terms of infrastructure improvements. 3) America is moving toward the Third World model. Rule of law has been subverted because equality under the law is disappearing as special interests carve out exemptions to regulations and special favors under the law. The redistribution of wealth to government began decades ago -- total compensation for government employees now outpaces salaries in the private sector.
This entry was posted in Bailouts, Big government, Economy and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s