I don’t understand why anyone still believes this AGW hoax is about the saving the environment when the green crowd is open about their true redistributive intent. They tell us so. In their own words. Yet so many are willfully deaf. Why?
A new U.N. report estimates the costs of combatting “climate change” to be $1.9 trillion per year for 40 years. With statements like this in the report:
“Survey estimates that incremental green investment of about 3 percent of world gross product (WGP) (about $1.9 trillion in 2010) would be required to overcome poverty, increase food production to eradicate hunger without degrading land and water resources, and avert the climate change catastrophe.”
the need “to achieve a decent living standard for people in developing countries”
how can one argue other than that global warming hawks intend to give other people’s money away for purposes other than averting their made-up catastrophe? (Read the full story, here). Overcoming poverty? Increasing food production? Noble goals, but unrelated to global warming. And I don’t think food production will be increased by taking money away from American farmers, who are, I believe, the biggest food producers in the world.